{"id":4045,"date":"2025-05-07T12:03:43","date_gmt":"2025-05-07T10:03:43","guid":{"rendered":"https:\/\/www.francescopelliccia.com\/hri\/?p=4045"},"modified":"2025-06-05T16:50:13","modified_gmt":"2025-06-05T14:50:13","slug":"the-evolution-of-organizational-models-a-look-into-the-future-under-the-banner-of-agility","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/hrintelligence.it\/en\/the-evolution-of-organizational-models-a-look-into-the-future-under-the-banner-of-agility\/","title":{"rendered":"The evolution of organizational models: a look into the future under the banner of agility"},"content":{"rendered":"<p><span style=\"font-weight: 400;\">Currently, most organizations adopt <\/span><b>a hierarchical organizational model <\/b><span style=\"font-weight: 400;\">and within which each role is carefully defined and occupies a certain position in the corporate organizational chart. While such a model is the most common solution, it <\/span><b>does not allow for drawing on high levels of organizational flexibility and agility<\/b><span style=\"font-weight: 400;\">, and strongly inhibits the ability to make decisions quickly, elements of fundamental strategic importance in the context of a <\/span><a href=\"https:\/\/hbr.org\/2014\/01\/what-vuca-really-means-for-you\" target=\"_blank\" rel=\"noopener\"><span style=\"font-weight: 400;\">VUCA (or BANI) reality<\/span><\/a><!--more--><\/p>\n<p><span style=\"font-weight: 400;\">However, as <\/span><a href=\"https:\/\/www.accenture.com\/it-it\/insights\/technology\/modelli-pratiche-organizzative-agilita?utm_source=chatgpt.com\" target=\"_blank\" rel=\"noopener\"><span style=\"font-weight: 400;\">Accenture <\/span><\/a><span style=\"font-weight: 400;\">has already pointed out in a recent report, agilizing an organization requires profound change that affects all dimensions of the company, such as its operating model and practices, leadership style, corporate culture, and performance management systems.\u00a0<\/span><\/p>\n<p><span style=\"font-weight: 400;\">Such general arrangements are embodied in <\/span><b>various organizational models described in the literature<\/b><span style=\"font-weight: 400;\">. In the remainder of the article, we took a closer look at some of them, highlighting <\/span><b>their characteristics, advantages and challenges <\/b><span style=\"font-weight: 400;\">related to their implementation in organizations.<\/span><\/p>\n<p><span style=\"font-weight: 400;\">We are talking about <\/span><b>the <\/b><a href=\"https:\/\/www.mckinsey.com\/capabilities\/people-and-organizational-performance\/our-insights\/the-helix-organization\" target=\"_blank\" rel=\"noopener\"><b>&#8220;helix<\/b><\/a><b>&#8221; model and <\/b><span style=\"font-weight: 400;\">the <\/span><b>&#8220;fractal<\/b><span style=\"font-weight: 400;\">&#8221; <\/span><b>organization model<\/b><span style=\"font-weight: 400;\">, recently explored in <\/span><a href=\"https:\/\/www.bcg.com\/publications\/2022\/fractal-companies-are-the-organizations-of-the-future\" target=\"_blank\" rel=\"noopener\"><span style=\"font-weight: 400;\">a Boston Consulting Group study<\/span><\/a><span style=\"font-weight: 400;\">, but also about the <\/span><b>skills-based model<\/b><span style=\"font-weight: 400;\">, which in some respects has provided us with an important methodological basis as part of a project to redefine the organizational model in the retail sector.\u00a0<\/span><\/p>\n<p><b>The &#8220;helix&#8221; model &#8211; the helix organization<\/b><\/p>\n<p><a href=\"https:\/\/www.mckinsey.com\/capabilities\/people-and-organizational-performance\/our-insights\/the-organization-blog\/become-flexible-and-speed-up-with-a-helix-model-part-one\" target=\"_blank\" rel=\"noopener\"><span style=\"font-weight: 400;\">According to McKinsey<\/span><\/a><span style=\"font-weight: 400;\">, the helix organizational model is an effective alternative to the increasing complexity of matrix structures. This approach separates the traditional managerial hierarchy into <\/span><b>two parallel <\/b><span style=\"font-weight: 400;\">but independent <\/span><b>lines of responsibility:<\/b><\/p>\n<ul>\n<li style=\"font-weight: 400;\" aria-level=\"1\"><span style=\"font-weight: 400;\">One line focuses on <\/span><b>developing the people and skills needed to do the job<\/b><span style=\"font-weight: 400;\">, overseeing the career path of employees, dealing with hiring and firing, and leading performance management (<\/span><b><i>Capabilities management<\/i><\/b><span style=\"font-weight: 400;\">)<\/span><\/li>\n<\/ul>\n<ul>\n<li style=\"font-weight: 400;\" aria-level=\"1\"><span style=\"font-weight: 400;\">A second line of responsibility is responsible for <\/span><b>setting business priorities and providing day-to-day operational oversight<\/b><span style=\"font-weight: 400;\">, ensuring that business objectives are met. (<\/span><b><i>Value-creation management<\/i><\/b><b>)<\/b><\/li>\n<\/ul>\n<p><span style=\"font-weight: 400;\">In other words, in the helix model, an employee is accountable to a &#8220;<\/span><b>value-creation manager<\/b><span style=\"font-weight: 400;\">&#8221; who sets function priorities and oversees day-to-day work, and to a &#8220;<\/span><b>capabilities manager<\/b><span style=\"font-weight: 400;\">&#8221; who handles professional growth, performance appraisals, and hiring and firing decisions. Both managers <\/span><b>have equal importance and power <\/b><span style=\"font-weight: 400;\">within the organization.<\/span><\/p>\n<p><span style=\"font-weight: 400;\">By disaggregating the hierarchy and ensuring that <\/span><b>only one leader is accountable for a given set of responsibilities<\/b><span style=\"font-weight: 400;\">, it avoids the need for employees to simultaneously answer to multiple organizational figures with overlapping responsibilities (see Figure 1).<\/span><\/p>\n<p><i><span style=\"font-weight: 400;\">Figure 1 The &#8220;helix&#8221; model compared with the traditional matrix structure (McKinsey, October 2022)<\/span><\/i><\/p>\n<p>&nbsp;<\/p>\n<p><span style=\"font-weight: 400;\">In particular, by virtue of such a separation of responsibilities, the power struggles and conflicts often found in traditional matrix structures should end. This helps to preserve unity of command, reduce tensions, increase the speed of the decision-making process, and more effectively address the challenges that the matrix structure is intended to address.<\/span><\/p>\n<p><span style=\"font-weight: 400;\">According to the McKinsey study, <\/span><b>the main advantages of <\/b><span style=\"font-weight: 400;\">adopting a helix organizational model lie in <\/span><b>two key features:<\/b><\/p>\n<ul>\n<li style=\"font-weight: 400;\" aria-level=\"1\"><span style=\"font-weight: 400;\">First, such a model helps companies that have already achieved team-level agility to make it a reality for the whole company, making resource allocation easier and more dynamic<\/span><\/li>\n<li style=\"font-weight: 400;\" aria-level=\"1\"><span style=\"font-weight: 400;\">Second, it alleviates tensions between HQ and decentralized business units, allowing the latter a greater <\/span><b>amount of autonomy in decision-making <\/b><span style=\"font-weight: 400;\">and more room for <\/span><b>flexibility in reacting quickly to market changes<\/b><\/li>\n<\/ul>\n<p><span style=\"font-weight: 400;\">Of course, the challenges involved in implementing such an organizational model and maintaining it over time should not be underestimated. For its adoption to be successful, in fact, McKinsey stresses the need for the organization to make <\/span><b>certain strategic adjustments:<\/b><\/p>\n<ul>\n<li style=\"font-weight: 400;\" aria-level=\"1\"><b>Create an internal talent market: <\/b><span style=\"font-weight: 400;\">This requires leaders to have detailed knowledge of employee skill levels. Capability managers will need to understand the current and future needs of the company (working closely with value-creation managers to understand business priorities), which new roles are opening up, which existing roles are changing, which new initiatives need staffing and when, and what skills are required for each role.<\/span><\/li>\n<\/ul>\n<ul>\n<li style=\"font-weight: 400;\" aria-level=\"1\"><b>Make resource planning transparent and effective: <\/b><span style=\"font-weight: 400;\">It is important to have sufficiently mature resource and workforce planning to enable value-creation leaders to forecast staffing needs (key knowledge, skills, and experience) and to give capabilities managers sufficient time to match supply with demand for particular skills and roles.<\/span><\/li>\n<li style=\"font-weight: 400;\" aria-level=\"1\"><b>Balance performance management between the two lines of responsibility: <\/b><span style=\"font-weight: 400;\">In a helix structure, the two leaders responsible for people must be<\/span><b> aligned <\/b><span style=\"font-weight: 400;\">and willing to participate in employee performance reviews jointly.\u00a0<\/span><\/li>\n<\/ul>\n<ul>\n<li style=\"font-weight: 400;\" aria-level=\"1\"><span style=\"font-weight: 400;\">\u00a0The processes behind appraisals, as well as hiring and firing, should <\/span><b>integrate feedback from both capabilities managers and value-creation managers <\/b><span style=\"font-weight: 400;\">(although the former is ultimately responsible for aggregating feedback and communicating the appraisal).\u00a0<\/span><\/li>\n<\/ul>\n<p><span style=\"font-weight: 400;\">In particular, value-creation managers, who oversee employees&#8217; day-to-day work, should provide feedback on the competencies of the people in their teams so that capabilities managers can identify where development actions are needed.<\/span><\/p>\n<p><span style=\"font-weight: 400;\">In summary, for a helix organizational model to survive, capabilities managers must learn to <\/span><b>delegate decisions about the day-to-day activities of employees<\/b><span style=\"font-weight: 400;\">, while value-creation managers must <\/span><b>recognize the important influence that the role of capabilities managers has on their team members<\/b><span style=\"font-weight: 400;\">, in terms of <\/span><b>coaching and skill development<\/b><span style=\"font-weight: 400;\">. Ultimately, both types of leaders must recognize that they will achieve better results if they give up some of their control over people. If implemented correctly, however, the helix model has the potential to <\/span><b>provide the organization with the flexibility <\/b><span style=\"font-weight: 400;\">to keep up with the rapid pace of market changes and technological innovation.<\/span><\/p>\n<p><b>The fractal organization<\/b><\/p>\n<p><span style=\"font-weight: 400;\">Until recently, companies could compete successfully for customers or products on a global scale by <\/span><b>focusing on aspects of scale and efficiency <\/b><span style=\"font-weight: 400;\">under the direction of <\/span><b>strong centralized leadership.\u00a0<\/b><\/p>\n<p><span style=\"font-weight: 400;\">In the near future, however, the new winners will be those organizations that succeed in <\/span><b>bringing their teams closer to the end customer<\/b><span style=\"font-weight: 400;\">, distributing and <\/span><b>delegating decision-making power <\/b><span style=\"font-weight: 400;\">to conquer local realities and rapidly developing micromarkets.<\/span><\/p>\n<p><span style=\"font-weight: 400;\">This is the thesis supported by an interesting <\/span><a href=\"https:\/\/web-assets.bcg.com\/38\/3a\/0cfd96cd4290842eacc48a7f9a6f\/bcg-the-organization-of-the-future-is-fractal-may-2022.pdf\" target=\"_blank\" rel=\"noopener\"><span style=\"font-weight: 400;\">study conducted by Boston Consulting Group<\/span><\/a><span style=\"font-weight: 400;\">, which explores the concept of <\/span><b>fractal organization <\/b><span style=\"font-weight: 400;\">as an organizational model of the near future in response to the <\/span><b>increasing fragmentation of the global economy, <\/b><span style=\"font-weight: 400;\">which is<\/span><b>\u00a0\u00a0<\/b><a href=\"https:\/\/www.bcg.com\/publications\/2021\/fractal-advantage-in-a-fragmenting-world\" target=\"_blank\" rel=\"noopener\"><span style=\"font-weight: 400;\"> reshaping the competitive landscape.\u00a0<\/span><\/a><\/p>\n<p><span style=\"font-weight: 400;\">According to BCG, a growing number of companies that cannot take advantage of the benefits of scale production, i.e., innovative startups or companies acting locally, <\/span><b>are beating their much larger competitors by <\/b><span style=\"font-weight: 400;\">exploiting <\/span><b>a new source of competitive strength<\/b><span style=\"font-weight: 400;\">: the <\/span><b>&#8220;fractal advantage&#8221;\u00a0<\/b><\/p>\n<p><span style=\"font-weight: 400;\">Why? What enables these companies to compete effectively in the global market?<\/span><\/p>\n<p><span style=\"font-weight: 400;\">The term &#8220;fractal organization&#8221; refers to an organizational model that <\/span><b>departs from the hierarchical structure and centralized control <\/b><span style=\"font-weight: 400;\">typical of large corporations. This model is structured in such a way that <\/span><b>units or teams within the organization operate with a high degree of autonomy and responsibility, enabling them to react more quickly to changes in the market and <\/b><span style=\"font-weight: 400;\">customer<\/span><b> needs.\u00a0<\/b><\/p>\n<p><span style=\"font-weight: 400;\">Thus, this structure is reminiscent of <\/span><a href=\"https:\/\/www.treehugger.com\/amazing-fractals-found-in-nature-4868776\" target=\"_blank\" rel=\"noopener\"><b>fractals <\/b><\/a><b>in mathematics (or in nature)<\/b><span style=\"font-weight: 400;\">, which are characterized by the repetition of similar structures on different scales of observation, enabling the organization to <\/span><b>be agile, flexible and resilient in the face of emerging challenges and opportunities.<\/b><\/p>\n<p><b>The fractal model <\/b><span style=\"font-weight: 400;\">emerges from the need for innovation, speed, and responsiveness to local markets and changing customer needs, contrasting with the old business paradigm focused on scale and operational efficiency, driven by central leadership, below which lie various organizational layers. In contrast, fractal organizations are characterized by strong <\/span><b>decentralization, with customer-oriented teams enjoying significant decision-making autonomy, and promoting real-time, transparent, multidirectional information flow<\/b><span style=\"font-weight: 400;\">.<\/span><\/p>\n<p><span style=\"font-weight: 400;\">Fractal organizations, in fact, respond to radically different <\/span><b>organizational design principles <\/b><span style=\"font-weight: 400;\">than traditional ones, including (see Figure 2):\u00a0<\/span><\/p>\n<ul>\n<li style=\"font-weight: 400;\" aria-level=\"2\"><b>Roles, responsibilities, and relationships<\/b><span style=\"font-weight: 400;\">. Fractal companies are less focused on hierarchy and more on <\/span><b>maximizing interactions<\/b><span style=\"font-weight: 400;\">, linkages, and connections between hierarchical levels, including customers and external partners.\u00a0<\/span><\/li>\n<\/ul>\n<ul>\n<li style=\"font-weight: 400;\" aria-level=\"1\"><b>Distribution of decision-making power<\/b><span style=\"font-weight: 400;\">. Fractal companies assign significant power <\/span><b>to customer-facing teams<\/b><span style=\"font-weight: 400;\">, enabling them to make important decisions and adapt quickly to market changes<\/span><\/li>\n<\/ul>\n<ul>\n<li style=\"font-weight: 400;\" aria-level=\"1\"><span style=\"font-weight: 400;\">Information<\/span><b> flow and management.<\/b><span style=\"font-weight: 400;\"> The: Fractal organizations promote real-time, transparent and multidirectional data access, overcoming data privacy typical of traditional organizational models based on scale, hierarchy and centralized control<\/span><\/li>\n<\/ul>\n<p><b><i>Figure 2 <\/i><\/b><span style=\"font-weight: 400;\">The organizational design principles underlying the fractal model<\/span><\/p>\n<p><span style=\"font-weight: 400;\">(<\/span><i><span style=\"font-weight: 400;\">Boston Consulting Group. 2022. The Organization of the Future Is Fractal. May 2022<\/span><\/i><a href=\"https:\/\/web-assets.bcg.com\/38\/3a\/0cfd96cd4290842eacc48a7f9a6f\/bcg-the-organization-of-the-future-is-fractal-may-2022.pdf\" target=\"_blank\" rel=\"noopener\"><i><span style=\"font-weight: 400;\">. https:\/\/web-assets.<\/span><\/i><\/a><i><span style=\"font-weight: 400;\">bcg.com\/38\/3a\/0cfd96cd4290842eacc48a7f9a6f\/bcg-the-organization-of-the-future-is-fractal-may-2022.pdf.)<\/span><\/i><\/p>\n<p>&nbsp;<\/p>\n<p><b>The Skills-based organizational model<\/b><\/p>\n<p><span style=\"font-weight: 400;\">As we have explored in one of our previous articles, in its most radical form, taking a skills-based approach to redefining an organizational model requires the <\/span><b>&#8220;deconstruction&#8221; and &#8220;reconstruction&#8221; of work, <\/b><span style=\"font-weight: 400;\">a key emerging capability for organizations:<\/span><\/p>\n<ul>\n<li style=\"font-weight: 400;\" aria-level=\"1\"><span style=\"font-weight: 400;\">Job <\/span><b>deconstruction means reconsidering roles (jobs) to analyze their components (tasks)<\/b><span style=\"font-weight: 400;\">, and determining <\/span><b>which ones can be performed optimally by AI-based systems <\/b><span style=\"font-weight: 400;\">or <\/span><b>talent from outside the organization<\/b><span style=\"font-weight: 400;\">, considering employees in terms of skills and competencies.<\/span><\/li>\n<\/ul>\n<ul>\n<li style=\"font-weight: 400;\" aria-level=\"1\"><b>Reconstruction <\/b><span style=\"font-weight: 400;\">means <\/span><b>reassembling tasks differently, in new and more effective combinations<\/b><span style=\"font-weight: 400;\">. This is not only limited to new full-time jobs but also embraces <\/span><b>alternative contractual or work performance forms<\/b><span style=\"font-weight: 400;\">, such as freelance and fully remote workers, gig workers, and contract consultants.<\/span><\/li>\n<\/ul>\n<p>&nbsp;<\/p>\n<p><span style=\"font-weight: 400;\">Of course, the adoption of a skills-based organizational model in such forms necessitates comprehensive and up-to-date skills mapping, and can be said to be the <\/span><b>concluding stage of a much broader continuum of skills-based organizational solutions<\/b><span style=\"font-weight: 400;\">, which may start <\/span><b>from a delimited intervention <\/b><span style=\"font-weight: 400;\">to <\/span><b>a few key processes<\/b><span style=\"font-weight: 400;\">, to assessing the impacts of such a change on a specific organizational area.\u00a0<\/span><\/p>\n<p><span style=\"font-weight: 400;\">In particular, <\/span><a href=\"https:\/\/joshbersin.com\/2023\/07\/building-a-skills-based-organization-the-exciting-but-sober-reality\/\" target=\"_blank\" rel=\"noopener\"><span style=\"font-weight: 400;\">according to HR analyst and U.S. speaker <\/span><b>Josh Bersin<\/b><\/a><span style=\"font-weight: 400;\">, numerous difficulties are<\/span> <span style=\"font-weight: 400;\">associated with implementing <\/span><b>a comprehensive competency model <\/b><span style=\"font-weight: 400;\">at the organizational level.<\/span><\/p>\n<p><span style=\"font-weight: 400;\">These include:<\/span><\/p>\n<ul>\n<li style=\"font-weight: 400;\" aria-level=\"1\"><span style=\"font-weight: 400;\">The difficulty of structuring <\/span><b>the architecture of the model<\/b><span style=\"font-weight: 400;\">, that is, identifying a comprehensive and functional set of macrocategories of skills for mapping, which <\/span><b>must prove future-proof <\/b><span style=\"font-weight: 400;\">with respect to emerging skills related to the AI and new technology world.\u00a0<\/span><\/li>\n<li style=\"font-weight: 400;\" aria-level=\"1\"><span style=\"font-weight: 400;\">The problematic <\/span><b>nature of defining and naming individual skills<\/b><span style=\"font-weight: 400;\">: within such a taxonomy, which corresponds to a huge data set (tens of thousands of hierarchically organized skills) each formula or item is potentially subject to debate. Will one opt for &#8220;collaboration&#8221; or &#8220;teamwork&#8221;? &#8220;Java&#8221; or &#8220;java programming&#8221; or &#8220;java language&#8221;?<\/span><\/li>\n<li style=\"font-weight: 400;\" aria-level=\"1\"><span style=\"font-weight: 400;\">The difficulties of <\/span><b>customizing these huge datasets <\/b><span style=\"font-weight: 400;\">by business sector: energy companies have refining, manufacturing, and distribution expertise. Consumer products companies have brand marketing, product marketing expertise. Pharmaceutical and chemical companies have scientific, and regulated manufacturing expertise.<\/span><\/li>\n<li style=\"font-weight: 400;\" aria-level=\"1\"><span style=\"font-weight: 400;\">Last but not least, once the competency model is defined, the need to <\/span><b>verify the level of mastery of these skills<\/b><span style=\"font-weight: 400;\">, through the <\/span><b>mapping <\/b><span style=\"font-weight: 400;\">process, raises additional issues, related to the choice of evaluation criteria to be used, the evaluating subjects and the frequency of the evaluation itself.<\/span><\/li>\n<\/ul>\n<p><span style=\"font-weight: 400;\">By virtue of these and other recognized obstacles, according to Bersin, organizations wishing to embark on the road to a skills-based organizational model should begin <\/span><b>by focusing on a single process or problem to be solved<\/b><span style=\"font-weight: 400;\">, using the skills-based approach in <\/span><b>a manner circumscribed to them. <\/b><span style=\"font-weight: 400;\">In this way, it will be possible, according to Bersin, to build a <\/span><b>skills model delimited to a few organizational areas in <\/b><span style=\"font-weight: 400;\">order to <\/span><b>gather data on how well the tools and methodologies used work<\/b><span style=\"font-weight: 400;\">, but also on the effectiveness of the governance mechanisms established for that process.<\/span><\/p>\n<p><span style=\"font-weight: 400;\">An important caveat in implementing a model and mapping of competencies in these ways concerns the need to <\/span><b>involve the business early on in the work of managing, governance and updating <\/b><span style=\"font-weight: 400;\">these models.<\/span><\/p>\n<p><span style=\"font-weight: 400;\">One of the examples provided by the U.S. analyst concerns <\/span><b>American Express, <\/b><span style=\"font-weight: 400;\">which adopted a skills-based approach to address a specific organizational problem: the high turnover that characterized its customer service department. In doing so, it <\/span><b>first developed a skills model <\/b><span style=\"font-weight: 400;\">for this organizational area, in close collaboration with the leadership team.<\/span><\/p>\n<p><span style=\"font-weight: 400;\">In implementing such a model, they realized at Amex that the skills needed by sales and service teams <\/span><b>were not typical customer service skills at all<\/b><span style=\"font-weight: 400;\">, but rather those of the <\/span><b>hotel and hospitality industry.<\/b><span style=\"font-weight: 400;\"> Amex treats customers as guests, so it began recruiting staff from the Ritz-Carlton and other companies in the hospitality industry.\u00a0<\/span><\/p>\n<p><span style=\"font-weight: 400;\">In addition, the company has used the skills model <\/span><b>to identify better internal candidates and improve external selection <\/b><span style=\"font-weight: 400;\">by constructing assessments and interview questions in a way that is targeted to the assessment of skills established by the model. The skills-based approach, in fact, can <\/span><b>make an important contribution to reflections on the make-or-buy of <\/b><span style=\"font-weight: 400;\">professional-technical <\/span><b>skills<\/b><span style=\"font-weight: 400;\">, guiding decisions about which skills to develop &#8220;in-house&#8221; and for which it is appropriate to go to the market. This is a most valuable help when one considers that <\/span><a href=\"https:\/\/joshbersin.com\/2019\/10\/build-vs-buy-the-days-of-hiring-scarce-technical-skills-are-over\/\" target=\"_blank\" rel=\"noopener\"><span style=\"font-weight: 400;\">in-house development of such skills can be far less costly <\/span><\/a><span style=\"font-weight: 400;\">than finding them on the market.<\/span><\/p>\n<p><span style=\"font-weight: 400;\">Use cases similar to the latter abound and <\/span><b>can cover different HR processes: <\/b><span style=\"font-weight: 400;\">in addition to recruiting<\/span><a href=\"https:\/\/www2.deloitte.com\/content\/dam\/insights\/articles\/us175310_consulting-the-skills-based-org-report\/DI_The-skills-based-organization-report.pdf\" target=\"_blank\" rel=\"noopener\"><span style=\"font-weight: 400;\">, career development and compensation processes can also benefit from a skills-based approach<\/span><\/a><span style=\"font-weight: 400;\">.\u00a0<\/span><\/p>\n<p><b>Conclusions<\/b><\/p>\n<p><span style=\"font-weight: 400;\">In an increasingly volatile, uncertain, complex and ambiguous reality, the evolution of organizational models toward <\/span><b>greater agility <\/b><span style=\"font-weight: 400;\">is an inevitable process. Traditional models, however well-established they may be, can no longer effectively meet the needs for agility and flexibility demanded by the current competitive environment.\u00a0<\/span><\/p>\n<p><span style=\"font-weight: 400;\">However, it is important to note that the transition to these new organizational models <\/span><b>is challenging<\/b><span style=\"font-weight: 400;\">.\u00a0<\/span><\/p>\n<p><span style=\"font-weight: 400;\">As noted above, <\/span><b>the helix model <\/b><span style=\"font-weight: 400;\">presents significant challenges especially in relation to the <\/span><b>cultural changes <\/b><span style=\"font-weight: 400;\">imposed on management by virtue of the separation of people management responsibilities from day-to-day operational responsibilities, a concept that can be difficult to accept for leaders accustomed to traditional hierarchical structures. Also not to be underestimated for its effective adoption is the <\/span><b>need for constant alignment <\/b><span style=\"font-weight: 400;\">between the two lines of responsibility.<\/span><\/p>\n<p><span style=\"font-weight: 400;\">Compared to the <\/span><b>skills-based model<\/b><span style=\"font-weight: 400;\">, in addition to a significant cultural change, from a technical perspective, organizations must address <\/span><b>the complexity of mapping and continuously updating skills<\/b><span style=\"font-weight: 400;\">, as well as creating <\/span><b>internal talent marketplace platforms, <\/b><span style=\"font-weight: 400;\">which requires, among other things, <\/span><b>an advanced technology infrastructure <\/b><span style=\"font-weight: 400;\">for data governance.<\/span><\/p>\n<p><span style=\"font-weight: 400;\">Related to <\/span><b>the fractal organization<\/b><span style=\"font-weight: 400;\">, another challenge is <\/span><b>the need to redefine decision-making processes and ways of working<\/b><span style=\"font-weight: 400;\">. This requires teams to develop capacities for self-management and shared responsibility, which can clash with traditional structures that are still entrenched, as well as the need to balance local autonomy and global strategic alignment.<\/span><\/p>\n<p><span style=\"font-weight: 400;\">Net of the challenges, are these the right recipes for achieving real organizational agility, required by a competitive scenario that seems to reward not so much operational efficiency, but rather the <\/span><b>ability to respond quickly to crises and changes<\/b><a href=\"https:\/\/www.ilsaggiatore.com\/libro\/antifragile\" target=\"_blank\" rel=\"noopener\"><span style=\"font-weight: 400;\">, benefiting the future?<\/span><\/a><\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"<p>Currently, most organizations adopt a hierarchical organizational model and within which each role is carefully defined and occupies a certain position in the corporate organizational chart. While such a model is the most common solution, it does not allow for drawing on high levels of organizational flexibility and agility, and strongly inhibits the ability to [&hellip;]<\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":5,"featured_media":0,"comment_status":"open","ping_status":"open","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"_jetpack_memberships_contains_paid_content":false,"footnotes":""},"categories":[1],"tags":[],"class_list":["post-4045","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","hentry","category-senza-categoria"],"jetpack_featured_media_url":"","jetpack_sharing_enabled":true,"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/hrintelligence.it\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/4045","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/hrintelligence.it\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/hrintelligence.it\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/hrintelligence.it\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/5"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/hrintelligence.it\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=4045"}],"version-history":[{"count":3,"href":"https:\/\/hrintelligence.it\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/4045\/revisions"}],"predecessor-version":[{"id":4048,"href":"https:\/\/hrintelligence.it\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/4045\/revisions\/4048"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/hrintelligence.it\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=4045"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/hrintelligence.it\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=4045"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/hrintelligence.it\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=4045"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}