{"id":4040,"date":"2025-03-24T17:04:09","date_gmt":"2025-03-24T16:04:09","guid":{"rendered":"https:\/\/www.francescopelliccia.com\/hri\/?p=4040"},"modified":"2025-07-11T15:35:24","modified_gmt":"2025-07-11T13:35:24","slug":"change-management-to-the-test-of-continuous-change","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/hrintelligence.it\/en\/change-management-to-the-test-of-continuous-change\/","title":{"rendered":"Change management to the test of continuous change"},"content":{"rendered":"<p><span style=\"font-weight: 400;\">In recent years, the transformations undergone by the global competitive environment have generated a landscape in which organizational change <\/span><b>can no longer be approached as an episodic and discrete event<\/b><span style=\"font-weight: 400;\">.<\/span><!--more--><\/p>\n<p><span style=\"font-weight: 400;\">From making discontinuity choices with respect to organizational models, ways of working or technological solutions to be used with a view to greater productivity and efficiency, change has now taken the form of <\/span><b>a structural condition, <\/b><span style=\"font-weight: 400;\">necessary not only to aim for continuous improvement, but for the <\/span><b>very survival of <\/b><span style=\"font-weight: 400;\">organizations.<\/span><\/p>\n<p><span style=\"font-weight: 400;\">Without wishing to be exhaustive, it is possible to identify <\/span><b>some key factors <\/b><span style=\"font-weight: 400;\">that have contributed more than others to this evolution:<\/span><\/p>\n<p><span style=\"font-weight: 400;\">First and foremost <\/span><b>is technological advancement<\/b><span style=\"font-weight: 400;\">, which is characterized by <\/span><b>increasingly rapid innovation cycles: <\/b><span style=\"font-weight: 400;\">new technologies are emerging at an unprecedented rate, forcing companies to continuously adapt and innovate in order to survive and remain competitive.<\/span><\/p>\n<p><span style=\"font-weight: 400;\">Of course, the increasing <\/span><b>volatility of the economic and geopolitical scenario <\/b><span style=\"font-weight: 400;\">plays an equally important role: events such as <\/span><b>recessions, pandemics and constant international instability <\/b><span style=\"font-weight: 400;\">have demonstrated the fragility of traditional business models and the need for greater flexibility and resilience on the part of organizations.<\/span><\/p>\n<p><span style=\"font-weight: 400;\">Finally, for B2C organizations, <\/span><b>the evolution in the expectations of the end customer<\/b><span style=\"font-weight: 400;\">, who demands a highly personalized experience at every touchpoint with the organization, and whose desires now completely escape the rigid logic of <\/span><i><span style=\"font-weight: 400;\">homo economicus<\/span><\/i><span style=\"font-weight: 400;\">, but are influenced by emotions, values and social factors that make decision making much more complex and less predictable.<\/span><\/p>\n<p><span style=\"font-weight: 400;\">The literature refers to this as the <\/span><b>maintenance phase<\/b><span style=\"font-weight: 400;\">.<\/span><\/p>\n<p>&nbsp;<\/p>\n<p><b>In short, we find ourselves<\/b><span style=\"font-weight: 400;\">\u00a0in a scenario\u00a0<\/span><b>perfectly described<\/b><span style=\"font-weight: 400;\">\u00a0by the acronym<\/span> <a href=\"https:\/\/medium.com\/@cascio\/facing-the-age-of-chaos-b00687b1f51d\" target=\"_blank\" rel=\"noopener\"><span style=\"font-weight: 400;\">BANI, <\/span><\/a><span style=\"font-weight: 400;\">coined by the American futurist and researcher Jamais Cascio to indicate the fragility of modern political and social systems (<\/span><b>Brittle<\/b><span style=\"font-weight: 400;\">), the growing collective anxiety brought about by uncertainty (<\/span><b>Anxious<\/b><span style=\"font-weight: 400;\">), combined with the nonlinearity (<\/span><b>Non Linear<\/b><span style=\"font-weight: 400;\">) and difficulty of understanding (<\/span><b>Incomprehensible) <\/b><span style=\"font-weight: 400;\">of the reality in which we live.<\/span><\/p>\n<p>&nbsp;<\/p>\n<p><b>The change \u201cis changing&#8221;?<\/b><\/p>\n<p><span style=\"font-weight: 400;\">Therefore, not without reason those involved in change management tend to emphasize how <\/span><b>the lenses through which to interpret change have evolved, following 4 main directions<\/b><span style=\"font-weight: 400;\">:<\/span><\/p>\n<ul>\n<li style=\"font-weight: 400;\" aria-level=\"1\"><span style=\"font-weight: 400;\">From an idea of change as a <\/span><b>moment of organizational discontinuity <\/b><span style=\"font-weight: 400;\">to a perspective of <\/span><b>continuous and iterative change<\/b><span style=\"font-weight: 400;\">, which proceeds by <\/span><b>experimentation and validation of <\/b><span style=\"font-weight: 400;\">hypotheses: from sporadic and isolated process to permanent organizational condition, from exception to rule<\/span><\/li>\n<li style=\"font-weight: 400;\" aria-level=\"1\"><span style=\"font-weight: 400;\">From a view of change as a linear, planned path from a current state (as is) to a desired state (to be), to an idea of change <\/span><b>as a continuous process of adaptation and learning<\/b><span style=\"font-weight: 400;\">, in which the organization constantly evolves in response to new conditions and opportunities, without a definitive end point<\/span><\/li>\n<li style=\"font-weight: 400;\" aria-level=\"1\"><span style=\"font-weight: 400;\">From a predominantly top-down process idea, to one of <\/span><b>co-creation and co-design with all stakeholders involved, <\/b><span style=\"font-weight: 400;\">to promote collective ownership and accelerate organizational learning about change, transforming it from an imposed event to a shared, participatory process<\/span><\/li>\n<li style=\"font-weight: 400;\" aria-level=\"1\"><span style=\"font-weight: 400;\">From a focus on the ability to design change to &#8220;stay the course&#8221; charted by the organization (or radically change it), to a focus <\/span><b>on the ability to prepare the organization for continuous change.<\/b><\/li>\n<\/ul>\n<p><span style=\"font-weight: 400;\">Ultimately, there has been a shift from a perspective of organizational change as a moment of more or less radical discontinuity, to a new view of change, to be conceived increasingly as a source of sustainable competitive advantage.<\/span><\/p>\n<p><span style=\"font-weight: 400;\">In this context of continuous change, the <\/span><b>change management challenge therefore takes on a new identity<\/b><span style=\"font-weight: 400;\">: it is no longer about managing single change events, but about <\/span><b>creating and sustaining a corporate culture that embraces change as an integral part of its organizational DNA<\/b><span style=\"font-weight: 400;\">.<\/span><\/p>\n<p><span style=\"font-weight: 400;\">Rather than resisting change or viewing it as a sporadic event, this approach focuses on the ability to adapt quickly to new challenges, market demands and technological innovations, <\/span><b>promoting a flexible and continuous improvement-oriented corporate culture <\/b><span style=\"font-weight: 400;\">to increase one&#8217;s <\/span><i><span style=\"font-weight: 400;\">change attitude <\/span><\/i><span style=\"font-weight: 400;\">and <\/span><a href=\"https:\/\/www.hbritalia.it\/homepage\/2022\/03\/29\/news\/costruire-organizzazioni-antifragili-e-coraggiose-15260\/\" target=\"_blank\" rel=\"noopener\"><b>antifragility<\/b><\/a><span style=\"font-weight: 400;\">.<\/span><\/p>\n<p><span style=\"font-weight: 400;\">A fundamental question emerges at this point: <\/span><b>can the <\/b><span style=\"font-weight: 400;\">change management models developed in the organizational literature and in the consulting field <\/span><b>still be said to be equipped to accompany organizations to deal with change in its new guise<\/b><span style=\"font-weight: 400;\">, guaranteeing the tools useful for dealing with continuous change?<\/span><\/p>\n<p><span style=\"font-weight: 400;\">In this regard, it is useful to analyze <\/span><b>two of the most established and widespread change management models in <\/b><span style=\"font-weight: 400;\">the literature to <\/span><b>assess their effectiveness <\/b><span style=\"font-weight: 400;\">in meeting the challenges of the new continuous change environment: the <\/span><b>Lean Change Management model <\/b><span style=\"font-weight: 400;\">and <\/span><b>Prosci&#8217;s ADKAR model.<\/b><\/p>\n<p><b>The Lean change management model<\/b><\/p>\n<p><span style=\"font-weight: 400;\">The roots of Lean Change Management lie in the Toyota Production System (TPS), developed in Japan after World War II. The central philosophy of this model lies in its <\/span><b>iterative, adaptive, feedback-based process<\/b><span style=\"font-weight: 400;\">, which distinguishes it from traditional change management models.<\/span><\/p>\n<p><span style=\"font-weight: 400;\">Unlike the latter, the Lean approach <\/span><b>in fact values collaboration and recursive improvement to effectively manage change.<\/b><\/p>\n<p><span style=\"font-weight: 400;\">Rather than implementing large-scale changes in a single solution, Lean Change Management <\/span><b>promotes smaller-scale, iterative changes<\/b><span style=\"font-weight: 400;\">.<\/span><\/p>\n<p><span style=\"font-weight: 400;\">This allows organizations to test changes, learn from them and make necessary corrections more efficiently.<\/span><\/p>\n<p><span style=\"font-weight: 400;\">In American consultant <\/span><a href=\"https:\/\/leanpub.com\/leanchange\" target=\"_blank\" rel=\"noopener\"><b>Jason Little<\/b><\/a><span style=\"font-weight: 400;\">&#8216;s recent formulation, the model consists of <\/span><b>three main stages<\/b><span style=\"font-weight: 400;\">: <\/span><b>Insight, Options and Experiments.<\/b><\/p>\n<p><span style=\"font-weight: 400;\">In detail:<\/span><\/p>\n<ol>\n<li style=\"font-weight: 400;\" aria-level=\"1\"><b>Insight<\/b><span style=\"font-weight: 400;\">: this is a phase dedicated to understanding the context and current state of the organization, which is useful in identifying <\/span><b>any obstacles and critical aspects <\/b><span style=\"font-weight: 400;\">that may limit the organization&#8217;s agility <\/span><b>and ability to pursue the desired change<\/b><span style=\"font-weight: 400;\">. To this end, there are several <\/span><b>tools or practices that can be used<\/b><span style=\"font-weight: 400;\">, including Information Radiators (such as the Kanban Board), <\/span><a href=\"https:\/\/www.olympos.it\/consulenza-aziendale-force-field-analysis.html\" target=\"_blank\" rel=\"noopener\"><b>Force Field Analysis <\/b><\/a><span style=\"font-weight: 400;\">tools, and assessments tools such as <\/span><a href=\"https:\/\/www.ocai-online.com\/\" target=\"_blank\" rel=\"noopener\"><b>the OCAI Cultural Assessment<\/b><\/a><\/li>\n<li style=\"font-weight: 400;\" aria-level=\"1\"><b>Options: <\/b><span style=\"font-weight: 400;\">this is a <\/span><b>generative phase<\/b><span style=\"font-weight: 400;\">: several options are identified for each insight to address the critical issues highlighted in the previous phase. Among the generated options, <\/span><b>the solutions deemed most effective are prioritized<\/b><span style=\"font-weight: 400;\">, using the<\/span><a href=\"https:\/\/leanchange.org\/elements\/change-canvases\" target=\"_blank\" rel=\"noopener\"><span style=\"font-weight: 400;\"> change canvas<\/span><\/a><span style=\"font-weight: 400;\"> as supporting tools. In addition, options are screened according to potential benefits and ease-difficulty of organizational implementation<\/span><\/li>\n<li style=\"font-weight: 400;\" aria-level=\"1\"><b>Experiments: <\/b><span style=\"font-weight: 400;\">After several possible solutions have been generated, project teams work together to create <\/span><b>small-group-pilot experiments <\/b><span style=\"font-weight: 400;\">to test their effectiveness. The underlying principle is to <\/span><b>monitor the results of the experiments, learning from those outcomes to determine next steps.<\/b><\/li>\n<\/ol>\n<p><span style=\"font-weight: 400;\">Finally, based on the outcomes, a decision must be made whether to adopt or abandon the change being experimented with. Adoption involves integrating the change into business processes, and using ongoing training and support to encourage widespread adoption.<\/span><\/p>\n<p><b>Prosci&#8217;s ADKAR model<\/b><\/p>\n<p><span style=\"font-weight: 400;\">Prosci&#8217;s ADKAR model is an influential and widely recognized change management model in the literature that emphasizes <\/span><b>the importance of individual change within the organizational change process<\/b><span style=\"font-weight: 400;\">. Developed by Prosci, a leading change management solutions company, the ADKAR model provides a <\/span><b>structured framework <\/b><span style=\"font-weight: 400;\">to help individuals successfully manage change, <\/span><b>through 5 steps:<\/b><\/p>\n<ul>\n<li style=\"font-weight: 400;\" aria-level=\"1\"><b>Awareness<\/b><span style=\"font-weight: 400;\">, involves creating an awareness of the need for change and the reasons behind it.<\/span><\/li>\n<li style=\"font-weight: 400;\" aria-level=\"1\"><b>Desire (Desire)<\/b><span style=\"font-weight: 400;\">, which aims to solicit in individuals a personal commitment and positive attitude toward change.<\/span><\/li>\n<li style=\"font-weight: 400;\" aria-level=\"1\"><span style=\"font-weight: 400;\">The third element is <\/span><b>Knowledge<\/b><span style=\"font-weight: 400;\">, which focuses on equipping individuals with the information and skills needed to cope with change.<\/span><\/li>\n<li style=\"font-weight: 400;\" aria-level=\"1\"><span style=\"font-weight: 400;\">The fourth element, <\/span><b>Ability<\/b><span style=\"font-weight: 400;\">, emphasizes the development of practical skills needed to implement change effectively. This step involves direct support through coaching and the opportunity to put the change into practice.<\/span><\/li>\n<li style=\"font-weight: 400;\" aria-level=\"1\"><span style=\"font-weight: 400;\">The last element is <\/span><b>Reinforcement<\/b><span style=\"font-weight: 400;\">, which aims to consolidate change through ongoing support. This includes recognizing and valuing the efforts of individuals to date, celebrating successes, and using ongoing refresher programs.<\/span><\/li>\n<\/ul>\n<p><b>Lean and ADKAR to the test of continuous change: what limits?<\/b><\/p>\n<p><span style=\"font-weight: 400;\">Although both models described so far provide valuable conceptual tools for change management, their ability to represent a <\/span><b>benchmark for organizations in constructing a new approach to organizational change <\/b><span style=\"font-weight: 400;\">is challenged by <\/span><b>three fundamental limitations<\/b><span style=\"font-weight: 400;\">, which it is worth analyzing in detail:<\/span><\/p>\n<p><span style=\"font-weight: 400;\">1) Lack of consideration of context as a determinant of change design<\/span><\/p>\n<p><span style=\"font-weight: 400;\">2) Limited sustainability of change in the long run<\/span><\/p>\n<p><span style=\"font-weight: 400;\">3) Simplification of the human, psychological and social factors of change.<\/span><\/p>\n<p><b>Lack of context<\/b><\/p>\n<p><span style=\"font-weight: 400;\">A significant limitation of traditional change management models is their tendency to overlook <\/span><b>the importance of the organizational context in which they are applied<\/b><span style=\"font-weight: 400;\">.<\/span><\/p>\n<p><span style=\"font-weight: 400;\">Of course, when we talk about organizational context, we are referring first and foremost <\/span><b>to the analysis of corporate culture<\/b><span style=\"font-weight: 400;\">, failure to take this into account in the preliminary stages of change management can greatly undermine the effectiveness of the entire initiative.<\/span><\/p>\n<p><span style=\"font-weight: 400;\">It, in fact, acts as a <\/span><b>lens through which every change initiative is viewed and evaluated by members of the organization<\/b><span style=\"font-weight: 400;\">.<\/span><\/p>\n<p><span style=\"font-weight: 400;\">Compared to this limitation, Lean Change Management models and the ADKAR model are no exceptions. The latter, in particular, tends <\/span><b>to focus exclusively on the individual dimension<\/b><span style=\"font-weight: 400;\">, oversimplifying and not fully considering the influence of the organizational context, corporate culture and power dynamics on the change process and the individual&#8217;s own transition path.<\/span><\/p>\n<p><span style=\"font-weight: 400;\">The effectiveness of the Lean Change Management model may also be strongly affected by the variable organizational context. Indeed, fruitful application of this model for a change management process requires <\/span><b>a significant mindset change oriented toward flexibility, adaptability and continuous improvement<\/b><span style=\"font-weight: 400;\">, which may be difficult to achieve in organizations with rigid structures or characterized by a managerial or strongly hierarchical management style.<\/span><\/p>\n<p><span style=\"font-weight: 400;\">For example, a company with a top-down management approach may find it difficult to embrace the collaborative and iterative nature of Lean Change Management, encountering resistance or implementing the model ineffectively.<\/span><\/p>\n<p><span style=\"font-weight: 400;\">The paramount importance <\/span><b>of aligning change management practices with organizational culture <\/b><span style=\"font-weight: 400;\">also emerges from Prosci&#8217;s 2023 <\/span><b>Best Practices in Change Management <\/b><a href=\"https:\/\/empower.prosci.com\/best-practices-change-management-executive-summary\" target=\"_blank\" rel=\"noopener\"><b>survey <\/b><\/a><span style=\"font-weight: 400;\">conducted annually, which involved some 2,700 participants from more than 38 business sectors. In fact, 59 percent of respondents placed the highest importance on <\/span><b>organizational culture awareness when designing a change initiative.<\/b><\/p>\n<p><i><span style=\"font-weight: 400;\">Importance of cultural awareness in defining the itinerary for change<\/span><\/i><\/p>\n<p><span style=\"font-weight: 400;\">\u00a0(<\/span><b>Prosci.<\/b><span style=\"font-weight: 400;\"> 2023. Best Practices in Change Management: 12th Edition Executive Summary. See also https:\/\/www.prosci.com\/blog\/why-change-management-fails)<\/span><\/p>\n<p><b>Limited sustainability of change over the long term<\/b><\/p>\n<p><span style=\"font-weight: 400;\">Another major limitation of traditional models of organizational change is their tendency <\/span><b>to focus on the implementation phase of change, with little attention paid to its sustainability and entrenchment over the long term.<\/b><\/p>\n<p><span style=\"font-weight: 400;\">The literature refers to this as the maintenance phase: its goal is to ensure that important transformations are adopted and utilized, become the accepted way of operating within the organization, and become ingrained in the corporate culture.<\/span><\/p>\n<p><span style=\"font-weight: 400;\">Even when it is actually provided for in change management models, the maintenance phase provides generic or abstract accouterments that merely argue for the need to reinforce the changes introduced, without adequately questioning the <\/span><b>proper ways in which such reinforcement must occur in order to function effectively in a complex social system such as an organization.<\/b><\/p>\n<p><span style=\"font-weight: 400;\">This is the case, for example, with the ADKAR model analyzed above, whose last stage (devoted to sustaining change) merely prescribes the recognition of milestones achieved and the possible introduction of timely corrective measures for difficulties encountered by change recipients<\/span><b>, without suggesting the need for long-term monitoring related to levels of change adoption.<\/b><\/p>\n<p><span style=\"font-weight: 400;\">With respect to the Lean Change Management model, on the other hand, it seems clear that its iterative process can lead change recipients and stakeholders to <\/span><b>develop forms of &#8220;change fatigue<\/b><span style=\"font-weight: 400;\">,&#8221; reducing involvement in the initiative and making the long-term sustainability of change more complicated.<\/span><\/p>\n<p><span style=\"font-weight: 400;\">In general, the proper conduct of a retention phase is made more arduous by the <\/span><b>tendency of organizational leaders acting as sponsors of change to shift their attention to new initiatives <\/b><span style=\"font-weight: 400;\">before retention efforts can yield their results.<\/span><\/p>\n<p><span style=\"font-weight: 400;\">Being absorbed by new strategic priorities, they may not give due centrality and importance to the maintenance phase, assuming that consolidation occurs spontaneously or is unnecessary. <\/span><b>However, the data prove otherwise<\/b><span style=\"font-weight: 400;\">.<\/span><\/p>\n<p><span style=\"font-weight: 400;\">In fact, Prosci&#8217;s same 2023 <\/span><a href=\"https:\/\/empower.prosci.com\/best-practices-change-management-executive-summary\" target=\"_blank\" rel=\"noopener\"><span style=\"font-weight: 400;\">research <\/span><\/a><span style=\"font-weight: 400;\">on Best Practices in Change Management shows that 81 percent of organizations that said they planned for a change maintenance and reinforcement phase <\/span><b>met or exceeded their change project goals<\/b><span style=\"font-weight: 400;\">, while <\/span><b>only 15 percent of those who did not plan for such a phase achieved the same results.<\/b><\/p>\n<p><i><span style=\"font-weight: 400;\">Impact of maintenance phase planning on the achievement of change management objectives.<\/span><\/i><\/p>\n<p><span style=\"font-weight: 400;\">(In <\/span><b>Prosci.<\/b><span style=\"font-weight: 400;\"> 2023. Best Practices in Change Management: 12th Edition Executive Summary.. See also https:\/\/www.prosci.com\/blog\/sustainment-in-change-management)<\/span><\/p>\n<p><b>Simplifying the human, psychological and social factors of change<\/b><\/p>\n<p><span style=\"font-weight: 400;\">It should be recognized how several of the traditional models of organizational change take into consideration the influence of human and psychological factors on the outcome of organizational change.<\/span><\/p>\n<p><span style=\"font-weight: 400;\">Almost all of them, however, have a <\/span><b>fundamental limitation<\/b><span style=\"font-weight: 400;\">: in fact, they tend to <\/span><b>conceive of the individual as isolated and separate from the system-organization of which he or she is a part<\/b><span style=\"font-weight: 400;\">, with the result of excluding from the conceptual framework all the <\/span><b>dynamics that act on the individual as part of a social group, <\/b><span style=\"font-weight: 400;\">far from being a mere sum of isolated individuals, as an organization is.<\/span><\/p>\n<p><span style=\"font-weight: 400;\">In fact, <\/span><b>many solutions merely follow the path taken by models such as ADKAR or <\/b><a href=\"https:\/\/wmbridges.com\/about\/what-is-transition\/\" target=\"_blank\" rel=\"noopener\"><b>Bridges&#8217; transition model<\/b><\/a><span style=\"font-weight: 400;\">, which introduce <\/span><b>accouterments <\/b><span style=\"font-weight: 400;\">within the process that ensure greater consideration of the human and psychological aspects associated with change, and in particular resistance to change, <\/span><b>but do not include more in-depth reflection on the typical dynamics of social groups <\/b><span style=\"font-weight: 400;\">and their impact on change management.<\/span><\/p>\n<p><span style=\"font-weight: 400;\">With respect to these expedients, the discipline of reference is <\/span><a href=\"https:\/\/www.peoplekult.com\/post\/a-critical-look-at-change-management-models-what-works-and-what-doesn-t.\" target=\"_blank\" rel=\"noopener\"><b>organizational psychology<\/b><\/a><span style=\"font-weight: 400;\">, which <\/span><b>can help explain why people resist change <\/b><span style=\"font-weight: 400;\">by incorporating into change management models strategies to build trust and transparency, address any anxieties and concerns related to change, or foster employee engagement with customized training and support initiatives.<\/span><\/p>\n<p><b><i>What to do.<\/i><\/b><b> New disciplines for a new approach to change<\/b><\/p>\n<p><span style=\"font-weight: 400;\">Given these limitations, <\/span><b>it seems difficult to <\/b><span style=\"font-weight: 400;\">be able to assign to these change management models <\/span><b>the license of suitability for continuous change management<\/b><span style=\"font-weight: 400;\">. However, the solution we are looking for may not lie in the total abandonment of traditional models, but rather in <\/span><b>the grafting within them of conceptual tools from other disciplines <\/b><span style=\"font-weight: 400;\">that can help <\/span><b>bridge the three fundamental limitations we have analyzed<\/b><span style=\"font-weight: 400;\">, making these models <\/span><b>better equipped to deal with the current dynamics of organizational change<\/b><span style=\"font-weight: 400;\">.<\/span><\/p>\n<p><span style=\"font-weight: 400;\">In this sense, the organizational psychology mentioned above is just one among several disciplines that can lend their contribution to this work of adapting contemporary change management models.<\/span><\/p>\n<p><span style=\"font-weight: 400;\">Another discipline that can perhaps ensure <\/span><b>greater effectiveness in addressing and overcoming the limitations of the change management models <\/b><span style=\"font-weight: 400;\">highlighted above is undoubtedly<\/span><a href=\"https:\/\/news.uchicago.edu\/explainer\/what-is-behavioral-economics\" target=\"_blank\" rel=\"noopener\"><b> Behavioural Economics.<\/b><\/a><\/p>\n<p><span style=\"font-weight: 400;\">Behavioral economics, in fact, can provide valuable tools for change management because of its ability to <\/span><b>anchor change strategies in empirical research on human behavior, <\/b><span style=\"font-weight: 400;\">offering essential tools for <\/span><b>the purposeful (and evidence-based) transformation of our behavior<\/b><span style=\"font-weight: 400;\">.<\/span><\/p>\n<p><span style=\"font-weight: 400;\">By understanding how <\/span><b>cognitive biases, emotions, and social pressures influence decisions, <\/b><span style=\"font-weight: 400;\">this discipline provides a conceptual framework that <\/span><b>is more closely aligned with the reality of organizations<\/b><span style=\"font-weight: 400;\">, which is critical for designing more effective change initiatives<\/span><b>.<\/b><\/p>\n<p><span style=\"font-weight: 400;\">With respect to the <\/span><b>first limitation <\/b><span style=\"font-weight: 400;\">highlighted, the <\/span><b>lack of consideration of context, <\/b><span style=\"font-weight: 400;\">the conceptual apparatus of Behavioural Economics can help to gain a <\/span><b>more nuanced and granular understanding of the organizational context <\/b><span style=\"font-weight: 400;\">by analyzing corporate culture, group dynamics within the organization and individual motivations, recognizing that every choice related to change is profoundly affected by the environment in which it takes place.<\/span><\/p>\n<p><span style=\"font-weight: 400;\">To do this, <\/span><b>it uses codified techniques and tools<\/b><span style=\"font-weight: 400;\">, such as informal network analysis <\/span><b>(<\/b><a href=\"https:\/\/www.linkedin.com\/pulse\/organizational-network-analysis-ona-come-scoprire-il-di-grazia-1qf0f\/\" target=\"_blank\" rel=\"noopener\"><b> Organizational Network Analysis<\/b><\/a><b> ), BIAS analysis such as the <\/b><a href=\"https:\/\/www.linkedin.com\/pulse\/il-cambiamento-e-bias-dello-status-quo--mcc0f\/\" target=\"_blank\" rel=\"noopener\"><b>Status Quo BIAS<\/b><\/a><b>, or the use of the <\/b><a href=\"https:\/\/researchworld.com\/articles\/3-frameworks-and-models-to-help-drive-behaviour-change-part-3\" target=\"_blank\" rel=\"noopener\"><b>COM Model.<\/b><\/a><b>(capability\/opportunity\/motivation)\u00a0<\/b><\/p>\n<p><span style=\"font-weight: 400;\">Instead, the ability to <\/span><b>maintain and reinforce change over the long term <\/b><span style=\"font-weight: 400;\">is achieved primarily through a focus <\/span><b>on consciously aligning change with the values of the corporate culture.<\/b><\/p>\n<p><span style=\"font-weight: 400;\">Such attention makes it possible to change the perception of change <\/span><b>from an imposition to a collective aspiration <\/b><span style=\"font-weight: 400;\">through a direct link to the organization&#8217;s core values, which also goes on to guide the choice of activities to be undertaken, i.e., the very content of the project phases.<\/span><\/p>\n<p><span style=\"font-weight: 400;\">In addition, the values serve as a guide even after the project ends, and amplify a sense of organizational cohesion and identity. This ensures <\/span><b>the sustainability of change over time even after the formal conclusion of <\/b><span style=\"font-weight: 400;\">the change management project.<\/span><\/p>\n<p><span style=\"font-weight: 400;\">The conceptual apparatus of behavioral economics has within it several tools that can facilitate the permanence of change over the long term: these certainly include the so-called <\/span><a href=\"https:\/\/www.linkedin.com\/pulse\/goal-gradient-effect-why-learners-speed-up-near-finish-tulsiani-lak9c\/\" target=\"_blank\" rel=\"noopener\"><b>Goal Gradient Effect<\/b><\/a><b>, incentive and reciprocity mechanisms<\/b><span style=\"font-weight: 400;\">, and so-called <\/span><a href=\"https:\/\/scholar.harvard.edu\/files\/todd_rogers\/files\/commitment_devices_2.pdf\" target=\"_blank\" rel=\"noopener\"><b><i>commitment devices<\/i><\/b><span style=\"font-weight: 400;\">.<\/span><\/a><\/p>\n<p><span style=\"font-weight: 400;\">Finally, it becomes apparent that, unlike the change management models we have illustrated, which tend to <\/span><b>eradicate the individual from the relevant organizational context <\/b><span style=\"font-weight: 400;\">by considering him or her in isolation, behavioral economics ensures a richer consideration of <\/span><b>group pressures and dynamics as dimensions capable of profoundly influencing individual behavior: <\/b><span style=\"font-weight: 400;\">when viewed through the lenses of behavioral economics, individuals never make decisions in isolation, but are influenced by interactions with others, group norms and the social context in which they find themselves<\/span><b>.<\/b><\/p>\n<p><b>Conclusions<\/b><\/p>\n<p><span style=\"font-weight: 400;\">Organizational change has now become a <\/span><b>structural condition <\/b><span style=\"font-weight: 400;\">of organizational life: no longer a goal to be achieved, but a permanent condition to be navigated. In this scenario, to support organizations in building a genuine <\/span><i><span style=\"font-weight: 400;\">change attitude<\/span><\/i><span style=\"font-weight: 400;\">, the tools available to them must necessarily evolve, <\/span><b>integrating existing models with approaches from new disciplines.<\/b><\/p>\n<p><span style=\"font-weight: 400;\">Among these, <\/span><b>Behavioural Economics <\/b><span style=\"font-weight: 400;\">proves particularly effective, offering a scientific evidence-based approach to human behavior.<\/span><\/p>\n<p><span style=\"font-weight: 400;\">As it turns out, the contribution of this discipline makes it possible to overcome the main limitations of classical change management models, reflecting more closely the complexities of the organizational environment.<\/span><\/p>\n<p><span style=\"font-weight: 400;\">In particular, the latter provides <\/span><b>more realistic keys to understanding its internal dynamics, and enables more incisive action on key behaviors, accelerating and consolidating change over the long term.<\/b><\/p>\n<p><span style=\"font-weight: 400;\">This impact is made possible by <\/span><b>recognizing the influence of context <\/b><span style=\"font-weight: 400;\">on the outcome of the change process, by <\/span><b>valuing the role of cognitive biases and social norms<\/b><span style=\"font-weight: 400;\">, and by promoting <\/span><b>strategies that anchor change in <\/b><span style=\"font-weight: 400;\">people&#8217;s <\/span><b>deep values and motivations<\/b><span style=\"font-weight: 400;\">.<\/span><\/p>\n<p><span style=\"font-weight: 400;\">Ultimately, adopting such a perspective does not mean abandoning existing models of organizational change, but rather enhancing them with tools capable of embracing the magnitude of the challenge that organizations face, to come to conceive of <\/span><i><span style=\"font-weight: 400;\">countinous change <\/span><\/i><span style=\"font-weight: 400;\">in a different light: from being merely <\/span><b>an obstacle to be addressed to a strategic lever for organizations&#8217; competitive advantage.<\/b><\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"<p>In recent years, the transformations undergone by the global competitive environment have generated a landscape in which organizational change can no longer be approached as an episodic and discrete event.<\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":5,"featured_media":2495,"comment_status":"closed","ping_status":"closed","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"_jetpack_memberships_contains_paid_content":false,"footnotes":""},"categories":[31],"tags":[84],"class_list":["post-4040","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","has-post-thumbnail","hentry","category-research-and-development","tag-employee-experience-design-en"],"jetpack_featured_media_url":"https:\/\/hrintelligence.it\/wp-content\/uploads\/2025\/03\/change-management.jpg","jetpack_sharing_enabled":true,"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/hrintelligence.it\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/4040","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/hrintelligence.it\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/hrintelligence.it\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/hrintelligence.it\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/5"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/hrintelligence.it\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=4040"}],"version-history":[{"count":3,"href":"https:\/\/hrintelligence.it\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/4040\/revisions"}],"predecessor-version":[{"id":4043,"href":"https:\/\/hrintelligence.it\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/4040\/revisions\/4043"}],"wp:featuredmedia":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/hrintelligence.it\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media\/2495"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/hrintelligence.it\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=4040"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/hrintelligence.it\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=4040"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/hrintelligence.it\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=4040"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}